Prepare Your New Journal Proposal Email
This front-end form prepares an official email proposal. Later it can be connected with the publisher CMS for file upload, proposal status tracking and journal setup workflow.
Journal Proposal Submission
Propose a New Peer-Reviewed Open Access Academic Journal
UnivColl Publications considers serious new journal proposals with clear academic need, defined scope, qualified editorial board plan, peer review model, publication frequency, metadata readiness, ethics alignment and long-term scholarly value.
New Journal Development
A New Journal Should Begin with Scope, Governance and Publishing Integrity
Launching a journal is not only a website task. It requires academic purpose, editorial governance, reviewer network, peer review process, ISSN readiness, article metadata, archiving, indexing visibility, author guidelines, publication ethics and long-term operational planning.
This page provides an official proposal route for new journals under UnivColl Publications. It helps collect the core information required to evaluate whether a proposed journal can be built as a serious scholarly publication.
Publisher DOI Prefix: 10.65919 | Connecting University & College Research Worldwide
8+
Journal Models
15+
Launch Checks
10
Proposal Fields
35+
CMS Fields Ready
Journal Launch Gateway
Scope to Scholarly Record
Title, scope, editorial board, ISSN readiness, peer review, DOI metadata and first issue planning.
UnivColl Publications
Connecting University & College Research Worldwide
What to Include in a New Journal Proposal
A complete journal proposal helps the publisher evaluate scholarly need, governance, sustainability, metadata readiness and ethical publishing standards.
Proposed full journal title
Short title or acronym
Aims and scope statement
Subject areas and keywords
Target authors and readers
Article types to be accepted
Proposed publication frequency
Editorial board plan
Editor-in-chief / managing editor plan
Peer review model
Open access and license plan
ISSN readiness or application plan
DOI and metadata plan
Indexing and discoverability plan
Archiving and repository plan
APC/publication fee plan if any
Conflict, ethics and plagiarism policy alignment
Launch timeline and first issue plan
Proposal Principles
Principles Behind New Journal Proposal Evaluation
A serious journal must begin with academic need, ethics, board quality and long-term record planning.
Scholarly Need
A proposed journal should address a genuine academic, professional, interdisciplinary or emerging research need rather than duplicate an existing journal without clear purpose.
Editorial Independence
Editorial decisions, peer review, acceptance and publication workflow must remain independent from sponsors, institutions, payments or personal influence.
Transparent Scope
The journal title, aims, scope, subject areas, audience and article types should be clear enough for authors, readers, editors and indexing systems.
Qualified Editorial Board
A serious journal proposal should include a credible editorial board plan with subject experts, affiliations, countries and profile links where possible.
Policy and Metadata Readiness
The journal should be ready for open access, peer review, ethics, licensing, archiving, metadata, DOI and Google Scholar visibility requirements.
No Guaranteed Launch
Submission of a proposal does not guarantee journal launch, ISSN, DOI registration, indexing, acceptance authority or public listing.
Journal Proposal Models
Types of Journals That May Be Proposed
The proposed journal model should match academic need, editorial capacity and publisher strategy.
Discipline-Specific Journal
A journal focused on a defined subject such as education, science, health, sports, humanities, commerce, law or technology.
Multidisciplinary Journal
A journal that covers multiple academic disciplines with clear sections, editorial coverage and reviewer mapping.
Interdisciplinary Journal
A journal designed around cross-disciplinary research such as AI and education, sustainability, public health, social innovation or digital humanities.
Professional Practice Journal
A journal connecting academic research with professional practice, policy, training, institutions or applied knowledge.
Regional / Global Research Journal
A journal with regional or global research focus, provided it maintains international editorial and publishing standards.
Open Access Research Journal
A journal committed to open access availability, license clarity, author rights, discoverability and stable scholarly records.
Specialized Emerging Field Journal
A journal dedicated to a new, fast-growing or underrepresented research area with clear scope and expert board.
Institutional Collaboration Journal
A proposed journal developed with academic institutions while preserving editorial independence and transparent governance.
Evaluation Criteria
How a New Journal Proposal May Be Evaluated
Evaluation may consider scope, editorial board, peer review, metadata, policy and sustainability.
Need and Differentiation
The proposal should explain why the journal is needed and how it differs from existing journals.
Scope Quality
The scope should be neither too vague nor too narrow, and should support consistent manuscript evaluation.
Editorial Board Strength
The proposed board should include qualified experts with affiliation transparency and subject coverage.
Peer Review Feasibility
The journal should have a realistic plan for reviewer selection, editorial screening and decision workflow.
Ethics and Policy Readiness
The proposal should align with publication ethics, plagiarism, conflicts, AI use, data, consent and corrections policies.
Operational Sustainability
The proposal should show a realistic publication frequency, first issue plan, author pipeline and editorial capacity.
Metadata and SEO Readiness
The journal should be suitable for clean URLs, citation metadata, Highwire tags, JSON-LD, DOI, sitemap and archive structure.
Publisher Portfolio Fit
The proposal should fit the publisher's scholarly mission, long-term brand and academic publishing strategy.
Editorial Board Readiness
A Journal Proposal Needs a Credible Editorial Structure
Board quality, role clarity, consent and subject coverage are essential for a serious academic journal.
✓
Proposed editor-in-chief or coordinating editor
✓
Managing editor or editorial coordinator plan
✓
Minimum subject-area editorial coverage
✓
Reviewer panel or reviewer recruitment plan
✓
Affiliation and country diversity
✓
Profile links for proposed board members
✓
Conflict disclosure for editors
✓
Editorial independence statement
✓
Board consent before public listing
✓
Role clarity for advisory vs editorial members
✓
Replacement or inactive editor policy
✓
Special issue and guest editor oversight plan
Launch Readiness
Minimum Checks Before Any New Journal Launch
A journal should not be launched until the core editorial, technical, ethical and metadata requirements are ready.
Journal title clarity
Unique short name/acronym
Aims and scope ready
Article types finalized
Frequency selected
Editorial board plan ready
Peer review process defined
Ethics and COPE-style policies mapped
Open access/license model defined
APC or fee status transparent
ISSN application plan prepared
DOI prefix/metadata plan ready
Archive/current issue structure planned
Submission and tracking route planned
First issue timeline realistic
Google Scholar and indexing readiness checked
Journal Proposal Workflow
Submit Proposal
From Journal Idea to Launch Planning
A structured workflow protects quality and avoids weak or misleading journal launches.
01
Proposal Preparation
Proposal lead prepares journal title, scope, subject areas, editorial plan, frequency, article types and launch rationale.
02
Official Submission
Proposal is submitted through the official journal proposal route with contact details, institutional information and scope summary.
03
Administrative Screening
Publisher checks completeness, title clarity, proposal lead, contact details, discipline, editorial plan and portfolio relevance.
04
Editorial and Strategic Evaluation
Proposal is evaluated for scholarly need, board readiness, peer review feasibility, policy alignment and long-term sustainability.
05
Decision or Revision Request
Proposal may be accepted in principle, shortlisted, deferred, declined or returned for scope, board or operational revision.
06
Journal Launch Planning
If approved, the project moves to domain/URL planning, ISSN readiness, board confirmation, policy setup, submission route and first issue plan.
Proposal Status
Possible Journal Proposal Status Outcomes
Status should be transparent and should not imply guaranteed launch or ISSN.
| Status | Meaning | Applicant Action |
|---|---|---|
| Received | Journal proposal has been received but not yet reviewed. | Wait for acknowledgement or provide missing proposal file if requested. |
| Under Screening | Basic title, scope, lead contact, discipline and proposal completeness are being checked. | Respond to administrative queries. |
| Under Editorial Evaluation | Proposal is being evaluated for academic value, board readiness, peer review feasibility and publisher fit. | Wait for decision or revision request. |
| Revision Requested | Publisher requires improved scope, title, board plan, frequency, policies or launch details. | Submit revised proposal. |
| Shortlisted | Journal may be considered for future publisher portfolio or subject expansion. | Maintain communication and update editorial board plan. |
| Accepted in Principle | Journal concept is approved for further setup, subject to formal launch, board confirmation, policies and technical readiness. | Follow publisher launch instructions. |
| Declined | Proposal is not selected at this time. | Applicant may submit a revised or new proposal later. |
Journal Metadata
Journal Information That Supports Future Publishing Infrastructure
Clean journal metadata supports URLs, DOI suffixes, ISSN readiness, article pages, archives and Google Search visibility.
| Metadata Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Journal Title | Identifies the official full title of the proposed journal. |
| Short Name / Acronym | Supports branding, URLs, paper IDs, DOI suffixes and citation abbreviation. |
| Aims and Scope | Guides authors, editors, reviewers and indexing systems. |
| ISSN Status | Tracks whether ISSN is pending, applied, assigned or not yet applicable. |
| Frequency | Defines issue planning, publication schedule and archive structure. |
| Peer Review Model | Clarifies review transparency, editorial process and reviewer workflow. |
| License Model | Shows open access, copyright, reuse and author rights status. |
| DOI/Metadata Plan | Supports DOI prefix, metadata tags, article landing pages and Google Scholar readiness. |
| Editorial Board | Shows academic governance and subject expertise. |
| Indexing Plan | Maps discoverability, sitemap, archives, metadata and application readiness. |
Ethics and Integrity
A New Journal Must Avoid Misleading Publishing Practices
Journal launch planning should protect authors, readers, editors, reviewers and the scholarly record.
✓
Do not launch a journal with fake editorial board members
✓
Do not list editors without consent
✓
Do not claim ISSN before assignment
✓
Do not claim indexing before acceptance by the relevant index
✓
Do not guarantee article acceptance to attract authors
✓
Do not use misleading impact factor or fake metrics
✓
Do not hide APC or publication fees
✓
Do not use journal proposal for certificate or promotion misuse
✓
Do not bypass peer review for personal or institutional submissions
✓
Do not copy aims and scope from another journal
✓
Do not use AI-generated fake editorial profiles
✓
Do not publish without stable article pages, metadata and archive structure
Proposal Decision Matrix
Possible Handling of New Journal Proposal Situations
Decisions depend on scope, board quality, ethics, sustainability and publisher fit.
| Situation | Risk | Possible Action |
|---|---|---|
| Clear scope, strong board plan and realistic launch roadmap | Low | Proceed to editorial and technical launch planning. |
| Good topic but weak editorial board plan | Medium | Request board development before approval. |
| Journal scope overlaps existing publisher journal | Low to medium | Merge, redirect, rename or revise scope. |
| Journal title is too broad or misleading | Medium | Request title and scope refinement. |
| Proposal includes fake indexing or impact claims | High | Reject or require complete correction. |
| Editorial board consent is unclear | High | Require written consent before listing. |
| Sponsor wants control over editorial decisions | Very high | Decline or require independence safeguards. |
| Strong concept but no immediate operational capacity | Medium | Defer or shortlist for future launch. |
Not Supported
Journal Proposal Practices UnivColl Publications Should Not Support
A journal proposal should not be used for false authority, predatory promises, fake editorial governance or misleading indexing claims.
!
Fake editorial board
!
Paid guaranteed journal launch
!
Claiming ISSN before assignment
!
Fake indexing or impact factor claims
!
Predatory journal-style promises
!
Guaranteed acceptance or fast publication without review
!
Journal title copied from existing journal
!
Copied aims and scope
!
Launching journal without peer review policy
!
Hidden APC or unclear fee model
!
Using publisher name before approval
!
Political, institutional or commercial pressure on editorial decisions
!
No archive, metadata or article landing page plan
!
Board members listed without consent
Related Policies and Pages
Pages Connected with Journal Proposal Submission
Journal proposals connect with journals, editors, peer review, open access, DOI metadata and discoverability.
Journals
Publisher-level journal portfolio and journal discovery route.
Open PageFor Editors
Editor responsibilities, editorial workflows and governance expectations.
Open PagePeer Review Policy
Peer review model, reviewer selection and decision support.
Open PageOpen Access Policy
Open access, license clarity and reader access principles.
Open PageDOI and Metadata Policy
DOI prefix, metadata structure, article pages and Google Scholar readiness.
Open PageIndexing and Discoverability
Indexing readiness, sitemap, metadata, archives and search visibility.
Open Page
Future CMS Plan
Ready for Journal Proposal and Launch Management System
Later the CMS can store proposal title, short name, slug, scope, board plan, ISSN status, DOI plan, frequency, launch timeline, indexing plan and decision status.
journal_proposal_id
proposal_code
journal_title
journal_short_name
journal_slug
discipline
aims_scope
subject_keywords
proposal_lead_name
proposal_lead_email
institution
country
proposed_frequency
article_types
peer_review_model
open_access_model
license_type
apc_plan
issn_status
doi_plan
editorial_board_plan
reviewer_panel_plan
indexing_plan
archiving_plan
launch_timeline
first_issue_plan
proposal_file
proposal_status
decision_note
created_at
updated_at
Important Proposal Notice
Journal Proposal Submission Does Not Guarantee Launch
Journal proposal submission does not guarantee launch, ISSN, DOI use, indexing, acceptance authority, public listing, domain approval, editorial title, APC model, fast publication or any external database inclusion.
Serious Journal Development
A Journal Must Be Built for Trust, Quality and Long-Term Scholarly Record
Strong journal proposals should show academic need, expert editorial governance, ethical peer review and technical publishing readiness before launch.
Journal Proposal FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Basic questions about new journal proposals, launch, ISSN readiness, DOI planning, indexing claims, editorial boards and institutional collaboration.
Who can submit a new journal proposal?
Academics, researchers, institutions, professional groups or subject experts may submit a serious journal proposal with clear scope and editorial plan.
Does proposal submission guarantee journal launch?
No. Submission does not guarantee launch, ISSN, DOI assignment, indexing, acceptance authority or public listing.
What should a strong journal proposal include?
A strong proposal includes journal title, short name, aims and scope, discipline, article types, frequency, editorial board plan, peer review model, open access plan and launch roadmap.
Can a journal be launched without an editorial board?
A serious journal should not be launched without a credible editorial structure and qualified subject expertise.
Can the proposed journal immediately claim indexing?
No. Indexing should be claimed only after acceptance by the relevant indexing service or database.
Can a new journal apply for ISSN?
ISSN readiness may be part of launch planning, but assignment depends on the relevant ISSN authority and required publication details.
Will the journal use DOI prefix 10.65919?
Where applicable and approved by the publisher workflow, journal article DOI planning may use the publisher DOI prefix according to DOI and metadata policy.
Can institutions collaborate on a journal?
Institutional collaboration may be considered, provided editorial independence, transparency, governance and policy compliance are protected.
Journal Publishing Pathway
Connected Journal Publishing Route
This page is part of the UnivColl Publications journal ecosystem. Journal discovery, calls for papers, issue records, archives, indexing disclaimers, ethics policies and author pathways are connected so that visitors can move through the publishing process clearly and responsibly.
Journal Portfolio
Review existing journal coverage.
Open PageFor Editors
Understand editorial responsibilities.
Open PageFor Reviewers
Connect proposals with review support.
Open PagePolicies & Guidelines
Review publisher policy readiness.
Open Page
Trust Framework
Journal Transparency and Responsible Publishing
UnivColl Publications presents journal information in a transparent academic publishing tone. Submission, payment, communication, editorial review or journal listing must not be treated as a promise of acceptance, indexing, citation, ranking, impact factor or third-party database coverage.
Peer Review
Journal publication routes should remain linked with editorial screening, reviewer suitability and independent editorial decisions.
Publication Ethics
Author instructions, journal calls, issue records and archive pages are connected with publication ethics and correction pathways.
Metadata Ready
Clear titles, canonical URLs, issue data, archive links and structured records support discoverability without making indexing guarantees.
No False Promise
No page should promise guaranteed acceptance, guaranteed Google Scholar, guaranteed indexing, fake impact factor or guaranteed citation.
Responsible References
External Scholarly Publishing References
These external links are provided for general scholarly publishing guidance. They do not imply membership, endorsement, indexing approval, DOI registration for every item or publication outcomes.
Next Step
Continue the Journal Journey
Use the next action according to your role. Authors can find journals and submit manuscripts, editors can review policy routes, and institutions can contact the publisher for documented collaboration.